Activity Level 2026-04-27 · 5 min

Tegner Activity Scale: documenting return to sport after knee surgery

Complete Tegner Activity Scale guide — 11 activity levels (0–10), return-to-sport criteria and combined use with the Lysholm score.

Ad space

What is the Tegner Activity Scale?

The Tegner Activity Scale was developed by Tegner and Lysholm (1985) as a complement to the Lysholm Knee Score. It is an ordinal scale from 0 to 10 that quantifies the patient's level of physical and sporting activity — not knee function itself, but what the patient is able to do.

Its main application is documenting return to sport after knee surgery, recording the pre-injury activity level and the current post-treatment level, and calculating the delta between the two timepoints.

The 11 activity levels (0–10)

LevelActivity
10Competitive football — national/international level
9Competitive football — lower divisions; ice hockey
8Competitive badminton, basketball, squash
7Competitive tennis, athletics, motocross
6Recreation: tennis, badminton, squash, running ≥ 5×/week
5Heavy work; cycling, running ≥ 2×/week
4Moderate work; cycling, cross-country skiing
3Light work; walking on uneven ground
2Light work; walking on even ground
1Sedentary work, no recreational activity
0Sick leave or disability due to knee problems

Calculate the TEGNER for free

Apply the questionnaire online and get the score with exportable PDF.

Clinical application and scientific publication

The Tegner scale is mandatory in virtually all knee surgery studies published in high-impact journals. ISAKOS guidelines recommend applying it together with the IKDC for complete characterisation of functional outcome.

CriterionReference value
Return to recreational sportTegner ≥ 6
Return to competitive sportTegner ≥ 7
Return to competitive footballTegner ≥ 9
Full return to pre-injury levelDelta = 0
Ad space

Reliability and limitations

The Tegner scale has good test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.80) and adequate construct validity when compared with objective measures of function (Briggs et al., 2009).

Main limitation: it is an ordinal scale with unequal intervals between levels. A patient who moves from level 4 to 5 has not necessarily improved in the same proportion as one who moves from 7 to 8. Consider this in advanced statistical analyses.

References

  1. 1. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. “Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.” Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1985;(198):43–9.
  2. 2. Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, et al. “The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries.” Am J Sports Med, 2009;37(5):890–7.